Social science and
choreography are not commonly combined. The main research methodology for the intersection between arts and social science is arts-based research, a field within qualitative research (Denzin and Lincoln 2000; Gnowles and Cole 2008; Leavy 2009). However, this project is initiated as an art project, and thus artistic research in choreography and dance is also included in my framework. Following is a brief description of similarities and differences between arts-based and artistic research.

Arts-Based Research using Choreography and Dance
“Grounded in exploration, revelation, and representation, art and science work toward advancing human understanding.” (Leavy 2009, p. 2)
Arts-based research practices are a set of methodological tools used in all phases of social research, including data collection, analysis, interpretation and representation (Leavy 2009). The field is an expansion of the qualitative paradigm, as opposed to the quantitative paradigm, where paradigm is a worldview through which knowledge is filtered (Kuhn 1962). Whilst quantitative research emphasizes the measurement and analysis of causal relationships between variables, qualitative researchers “[…] stress the socially constructed nature of reality, the intimate relationship between the researcher and what is studied, and the situational constraints that shape inquiry.” (Denzin and Lincoln 2000, p. 14). Qualitative research crosscuts disciplines, fields and subject matter, and has historically moved across traditions such as those associated with foundationalism, poststructuralism, postmodernism and posthumanism (Denzin and Lincoln 2000; Gnowles and Cole 2008). Arts-based research spans from literary to visual and performative practices, and is still in its formative stages. Instead of the more conventional term “method”, the term “practice” is frequently used in arts-based research, referring to the practice-based process of knowledge production in arts (Leavy 2009). Arts-based researchers use dance and choreography as a form of embodiment for representation or as interactive exercises in data collection.
Artistic Research in Choreography and Dance
“In dance the kind of knowledge that is not considered acceptable elsewhere becomes important; our physical memories emerge as events of significance. Scents, tastes, movements, feelings, thoughts… The unexpressed.” (Lilja 2006, p. 29)
Globally, artists increasingly engage in research, as a way of developing art forms beyond the demands of growing commercial art markets (Borgdorff 2010; Lilja 2006; Swedish Research Council 2007, P. 6). Artistic research has no common philosophical-methodological basis but rather acknowledges diversity in epistemological-ontological starting points (Bergdorff 2010, p. 13; Hannula et. Al. 2005, p. 23). However, artistic research mainly operates in the sphere of practical, embodied, knowledge of how to do something, rather than theoretical knowledge of knowing that something is the case (Bergdorff 2010, p. 12). Most artistic researchers both develop new products, such as performance or composition, as well as a unique understanding of the world, that is “embodied in the products generated by the research” (Borgdorff 2010, p. 10). The research can not be separated from the artistic practice (Borgdorff 2010; Lilja 2012), since a researching artist is both “subject and object for and within the research” (Lilja 2012, p. 73). As opposed to traditional artistic production, artistic reseach is characterised by participation and transparency, where the audience is an active part of shaping the research through discussions, as well as taking part of process documentation (Swedish Research Council 2007, p. 106).
Integrating Arts and Science
Since 1977, arts have been represented in the academic context in Sweden and interdisciplinary research has been encouraged in order to contribute to progress within the knowledge society (Swedish Research Council, 2007). Today, all higher education in Sweden is based on either science or art (Högskolelag 1992:1434, 1 kap 2§), and the number of artistic research positions within academia are increasing. However, processes and evaluation techniques within arts and science differ, and “[…] relevant examples and methods for simultaneously assessing both scientific and artistic merits are lacking.” (p. 163).
Arts-based research and artistic research operate within a common intersection of arts and academia. However, a number of fundamental differences are important to acknowledge. First of all, the purpose of the artistic process within the research as primary or secondary. In artistic research, the artist’s creative practice is the subject of research (Borgdorff 2010, p. 12), as opposed to arts-based research which uses artistic practices for qualitative research into social sciences (Leavy 2009). Secondly, the researcher’s relationship with the subject of study. Arts-based researchers acknowledge the intimate, reflexive relationship with the subject of study (Gnowles and Cole 2008; Leavy 2009). However, in artistic research the artist’s practice can not be separated from the research, since it is both subject and object for and within the research. Thirdly, the final aim of the research as to provide empirical evidence or to generate insights through dialogue with an audience. Artistic research emphasizes insights and comprehension rather that an explanatory purpose (Bergdorff 2010, p. 12).
References:
Borgdorff, H. (2010) Where are we today. The state of the art in artistic research. (eds) Lind, T. Forskning och kritik – granskning och recension av konstnärlig forskning. Årsbok KfoU (Yearbook for Artistic Research), Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council), pp. 17-31.
Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln Y. S. (2000) Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research, in Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln Y. S. eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hannula, Mika, Juha, Vadén, Tere. (2005) Artistic Research: Theories, Methods and Practices. Helsinki: Academy of Fine Arts.
Knowles, J. G., Cole, A. L. (2008) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leavy, P. (2009) Method Meets Art: Arts-based Research Practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Lilja, E. (2006) Movement as the Memory of the Body. Stockholm: Efva Lilja.
Lilja, E. (2012) What is "good" in art? The artistic research dilemma. In Formation. Nordic Journal of Art and Research. Volume 1, No 1. pp. 69-74.
Swedish Research Council. (2007) Kontext – Kvalitet - Kontinuitet. Utvärdering av Vetenskapsrådets anslag till konstnärlig forskning och utveckling 2001-2005. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie. 6:2007. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.